Note: If you can’t see this video on a mobile device you can watch it on YouTube directly.
In this post we take a look at a sample Cambridge Proficiency Speaking test from the YouTube CambridgeEnglishTV channel and add our own Proficiency speaking review. Go to the times listed to see a particular part of the speaking exam.
The candidates are Rodrigo from Argentina and Ollin from Switzerland.
Part 1 0:00 Part 2 2:00 Part 3 6:57
Part 1
In this part both respond to the questions reasonably well but they do deliver slightly short answers and could extend more. Rodrigo shows a good range of vocabulary and Ollin demonstrates good organisation of ideas.
Part 2
Rodrigo regularly starts the discussion and Ollin rarely offers initial opinions. In addition, some of her responses are a little short and could be expanded on significantly. Both interact comfortably and easily.
In the second part of the task Rodrigo’s responses, while also short at times, demonstrate a very wide range of language, and are adequate. Ollin, too, has a good range of language and links well to her partner’s ideas. There are very minor grammar errors for both, which have little to no effect on their performances.
Part 3
Ollin shows a very good level of organisation of her ideas in this task. Language is mostly wide ranging although there are some minor grammar errors. There is a hesitation in her answer to the follow up question and she could have responded a little better at this point. Generally a good example of how to complete this Part 3 task.
Rodrigo performs this task adequately. He uses a good range of language and organises ideas clearly. He is at times a little inaccurate and does not always get expressions correct.
In the final discussion section both do well although errors once again appear for Rodrigo and Ollin too returns to very short answers despite constructing some complex sentences.
In this video both candidates complete the speaking test adequately. While there are issues around grammar errors, short answers and occasional misuse of expressions, the pair performed quite well. They probably wouldn’t get the highest score in the exam but still demonstrate good ability and very good interaction. Rodrigo was always capable of dealing with any task and responding appropriately despite the occasional errors. Ollin showed a good range of language and organisation, which might have been better had she not cut some of her replies short.
A few things for you to think about.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |